2018ish-2019
More Recent Books Appear At The Top
Finished August 18th.
I was a tad disappointed. I had the privilege to interview Andrew when I was the director at Ecclesiam, and he was well spoken, thoughtful and informed. I didn't think he gave a thorough enough treatment of the subject, though that may be my expectations speaking and not his intent. I leave room to be corrected. Should he write a second edition, I believe it would be greatly enhanced by expanding the sections on the science and psychology around the subject as well as discussing the history, its incoherence, and adding interactions with others who have written on the topic, such as Ryan Anderson. |
Finished April 13th.
It wasn't bad. This is only the third book I've read completely on theonomy, even though I have read large portions of Bahnsen, North and Rushdoony at different times. The overuse of italics was distracting, but the writing is clear and accessible. I wanted to read what this "Cherem controversy" was for myself. After reading his book, I believe Joel's work, though incomplete on the Cherem Principle, and in some places unqualified (or simply underdeveloped), is still a sophisticated and faithful attempt at dealing with the penology of the Old Testament and its application in our modern day. His contribution has given me some ideas and trails to follow for my own doctoral work on ethics and penology. |
Finished September 15th. A great little book. It particularly jarred me how much I took sin for granted in my own gospel presentations. My only critique is their eschatology bleeding through in a couple of places and a few comments made toward culture redeeming that weren't germane. But - I will still recommend it.
|
Finished September 14th. What an amazing testimony! I had the privilege of seeing Rosaria speak during my undergrad and now I can appreciate that experience all the more. The only thing that felt out of place was her "Psalms only" position in worship. It seemed a bit forced into the story, though it came up later in the book with some conversations. This book does make me wonder why people like Rosaria weren't invited to the controversial Revoice conference in St. Louis, recently. Her voice should be highly valued and considered.
|
Finished August 22nd. I hesitated to take up this book because a church I previously attended applied its arguments to a degree I thought was too far; that tainted the water for me and preventing me from reading it for four years. Then I heard of Mark Dever talking about this book in positive terms. Capital Hill Baptist Church, however, and the previous church I attended, applied the content of this book in far different ways and look vastly different. Thus, I finally picked up the book and read it. Simply, it was great. I agree that our programs often become too big and squelch our vine work.
|
Finished August 16th. Great book. I am so accustomed to non-fiction that I don't get to enjoy good non-fiction writing. Most of the authors I read are grammatically free from error, linear, logical and ordered but they lack something. Crouch's writing. though, possesses a texture that makes others feel course. Great observations on culture making, power dynamics and how we can steward power while expressing God's image. I highly recommend it and will be chewing on its contents for months perhaps years to come.
|
Finished August 10th. A full review can be read here.
|
Finished July 11th. It was "okay." There are certainly flashes of brilliance at places, but about 50 pages could have been cut that did little to advance is overall arguments. To North's credit, I think what he was attempting is truly unique. No on in the field of international relations is seriously thinking about what the bible says to drive our ethic. Mostly, the Christians that are involved want to lay hold of the meta-physic (elevating the dignity of humans is good) but they don't want the epistemology (scripture) that grounds it as objective truth. Thus, much of the field rightly bows to natural theology or seriously mutes the Lordship of Christ. It was good enough to pique my interest to continue reading more political theology.
|
Finished June 24th. You can read a full review here.
|
Finished June 17th. Full review can be read here.
|
Finished June 13th. Although 1984 is quoted and refereed to widely in our culture, I had never read this book. I now see why people will sometimes refer to Orwell as a kind of soci0-political prophet. I think his genius, other than the prowess of his style and command of writing, was in recognizing the trajectories of ideas. Ideas have consequences. Every worldview has an eschatology.
|
Finished June 5th. I had first read this when I was perhaps 12 or 13. Lewis' prose is excellent and this particular book is a sobering and clever reminder that we are part of a much grander role of history. That role, nested in the vestiages of time, is headed toward an end, an eschaton, but we remain in the weeds of a great struggle. Lewis absotlutely created a new genre when he wrote this book. In fact, I have begun my own ongoing series themed in this genre and tone. You can read the first one, here.
|
Finished May 22nd. Full review can be read here. An easy to follow narrative of a couple seeking to adopt a child. It covers about a million practical little questions you would never think of along the way.
|
A full review written here.
|
Another book that we reviewed for an assignment. It's really a short treatise more than it's a book. I had previously glossed it but this time, reading an annotated addition, read the letter that was originally meant to accompany it to Pope Leo. I struck me as solidly "Luther," that is to say, Luther at his best.
|
Written by my brother-in-law, this is a pretty dark novel. I would liken it to a cross between No Country for Old Men and Wind River. Full review can be read here.
|